Search This Blog

Friday, October 9, 2009

Transcending the Senses


Where silent zephyrs sported with the dust

Of the Bastille, I sate in the open sun,

And from the rubbish gathered up a stone

And pocketed the Relic in the guise

Of an Enthusiast; yet, in honest truth,

I looked for Something that I could not find,

Affecting more emotion than I felt…

-William Wordsworth

The Prelude, Book Ninth


Reading these lines, I thought back to my recent summer experience throughout Belgium and the surrounding major cities, namely Paris and Amsterdam. Traveling to Europe, I enthusiastically awaited my encounter with the places that promised an awakening experience. I would finally see, smell, feel—ultimately experience—the places where many of history’s greatest events unfolded; as if these experiences would somehow reaffirm all the things that I had learned, to finally make complete sense of things, to reach a true understanding. However, this understanding cemented within the senses did not come.

As Wordsworth describes in these particular lines, he believes that by collecting a piece of the Bastille he would somehow become connected to the French Revolution; he would become a part of this cultural icon. Yet, upon Wordsworth’s possession of the stone, the reader is suddenly presented with a shift in the author’s psyche. This stone cannot provide that experience; the stone proves void of meaning. Wordsworth knows there has to be something else out there, something beyond empiricism.

Now presented with the realization of his limitations, Wordsworth suddenly becomes discouraged by the fact that his humanity bounds him; only so much can be fully grasped in the everyday. This particular episode marks a profound moment in Wordsworth’s road to disillusionment, for the senses provide only momentary feelings of meaning, feelings that instantly begin receding to an increasingly distant coast. Realizing that these feelings can only be renewed, Wordsworth becomes disenchanted as he ventures to discover a constant, something that cannot be taken away.

4 comments:

  1. I like how Wordsworth knew even as he was grabbing the stone to put in his pocket, that he would end up "affecting more emotion than [he] felt." It's as if he was doing what he's 'supposed to do' - go to Europe, experience life there, take souvenirs of remembrance. When I went to Spain and saw the Dali Museum, I couldn't think of anything to buy that would truly emobody the experience. And really, I knew that it's not that I couldn't think of anything; it's that there Was nothing. Seeing the Bastille, feeling the "Relic" and the "rubbish" in his hands; those are the things Wordsworth will take with him. So maybe such symbols are meant to bring us back to places that cannot be so simply represented. Don't fret, Wordsworth.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That realization of human limitation, Wordsworth's inability to grasp something that would physically and emotionally connect him to an idea, and recollecting that in the form of verse is a reaching for something beyond words. It reminds me of the folly of language to truly express the abstractions within our minds. The gaps between the signifiers and the signified. And what falls through those cracks as we attempt to use symbols to articulate intangible expressions within ourselves. The rubbish before him didn't elicit the emotions he expected...Not calling language rubbish, just commenting on that feeling wanting to express something or feel something, but not able really get at it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Everything seems to return back to Blake's idea of imprisoned senses, where we only see imitations, never originals. Perhaps Blake should do us all a favor and seek the original for us and introduce the "new" to shock us out of our realities.

    ReplyDelete
  4. While reading Michael's post my mind drifted to a somewhat related thought I'd had about a week ago. As my classmates seem to have fleshed out the pain of the human inability to connect with relics of the past or symbols of an idea fairly well already, I thought I'd talk about this insight I had into the nature of human experience in general. It occurred to me, while our lives have a sense of forward motion into the future, we understand ourselves as the sum of all that has happened to us in the past. Each experience we have in our lives is collected for us in our memory (although that memory is limited by time and age). Collected as our memories are, they are preserved for us - sealed forever. They are like a locked glass box that we have own for our lives and nothing can take it away from us. But we cannot open that box either and fully retrieve those experiences. We can see them, and how they've made us who we are, but we cannot relive them. They are both with us forever and gone forever.

    ReplyDelete